Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nexus Services, Inc., et al. v. Donald Lee Moran, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Augusta County, Virginia, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 18-1445 · judgment February 7, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
-
42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) is a federal fee shifting statute that permits a defendant to obtain attorneys’ fees where, inter alia, the defendant is a prevailing party, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. E.E.O.C., 434 U.S. 412, 422 (1978). To qualify as a prevailing party, a party must obtain a court ruling that marks a “judicially sanctioned change in the legal relationship of the parties.” Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, 500 Inc. v. W. Va. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., 532 U.S. 598, 601 (2001). The Tenth. Eleventh, and Federal Circuits have concluded that a voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)
-
does not constitute a “judicially sanctioned change in the legal relationship of the parties.” The Fourth Circuit here affirmed a district court ruling that held a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) granted the defendants prevailing party status and awarded fees and costs. The question presented is this: Can a party qualify as a “prevailing party” under a federal fee shifting statute when an adverse party voluntarily dismisses its claims under Rule 41(a)(1) even though the dismissal is self-executing and entered without a court order?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joseph R. Pope
WILLIAM & MARY LAW SCHOOL APPELLATE AND SUPREME CO
For respondent
Carlene Booth Johnson
Perry Law Firm, A Professional Corporation
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Aug 21 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Aug 01 2019Brief of respondents Augusta County, Virginia Sheriff Donald Smith and Deputies Donald Moran and Michael Roane in opposition filed.
- Jul 01 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2019)
- Jun 10 2019Application (18A1274) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 1, 2019.
- Jun 03 2019Application (18A1274) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 10, 2019 to August 9, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.