Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Raul Molina Deocampo v. William P. Barr, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 16-72298, 19-70091 · judgment April 5, 2019

Certiorari denied · January 13, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Sameer Hasan Hasan
Hasan Law Group PLLC

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jan 13 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 11 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
  3. Nov 21 2019
    Brief of respondent William P. Barr, Attorney General in opposition filed.
  4. Oct 30 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 21, 2019.
  5. Oct 29 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2019 to November 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Oct 02 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 8, 2019.
  7. Oct 01 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 9, 2019 to November 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Sep 06 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 9, 2019.
  9. Sep 05 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 9, 2019 to October 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Aug 08 2019
    Response Requested. (Due September 9, 2019)
  11. Aug 07 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
  12. Aug 01 2019
    Waiver of right of respondent William Barr to respond filed.
  13. Jul 03 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2019)
  14. Jul 03 2019
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.