Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joel Howard James v. Michigan
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Michigan, No. 342504 · judgment October 11, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Based on a “class of one” analysis, does the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution bar application of the nonresident tolling provision of MCL 767.24(10) where, although a person did not usually and publicly reside within the State of Michigan during the limitations period, no crime was reported nor any investigation initiated until years after the statute of limitations would otherwise have run?
-
Does the nonresident tolling provision of MCL 767.24(10) violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause in Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution insofar as it creates a distinction between residents of Michigan and nonresidents?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Matthew John Wojda
White, Wojda and Curtis
For respondent
Cynthia M. Muszynski
Alpena County Prosecutor Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 18 2019Petition DENIED.
- Oct 30 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
- Oct 16 2019Waiver of right of respondent Michigan to respond filed.
- Sep 30 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2019)