Alfred Risien Hamman v. University of Central Florida Board of Trustees

May we be denied procedural due process, including extraordinary process, guaranteed through the Constitution?

May the judicial branch leave obvious substantive due process abuses uncorrected?

In Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247 (1978), this court set the bar for relief at the denial of 20 days of statutory educational rights without the benefit of due process and an appeal on the substance, It also identified that principals and school boards were responsible for ensuring such. UCF, Valencia State College, and each public college and university in the state are mandated to provide the Dual Enrollment program which provides for eligible students to take any level of college course and concurrently receive high school credit. Florida Statute 1007.271 makes clear that the unique rights and protections afforded to all high school students are extended to Dual Enrollment students within the post-secondary institution in a way that traditionally matriculating students do not enjoy, and that the boards of each are legally responsible for upholding and executing all legislation in compliance with law. This question is whether the president and boards for each public post secondary institution, equipped with a cadre of lawyers responsible for ensuring compliance with law, should be held to the same standard as the nations high school principals in Piphus.

Given the above seems to fit the general description of child abuse, should the judicial branch have protected the precious, time sensitive rights of my son and all 1.5 million naive minors through the