Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re The Law Offices of Nina Ringgold, et al.
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I Matthew Melaragno, do swear or declare that on the date specified below, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the following: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS; CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE On each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing the documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days. The name(s) and addresse(s) of those served are as follows: Catherine Woodbridge, Esq. Office of the California Attorney General 12 Floor 1300 I Street Suite 125 Sacramento, CA 95814 Landon D. Bailey, Attorney Bailey PLC 980 9th Street 16th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nina R. Ringgold
Law Offices of Nina R. Ringgold
For respondent
Janill L. Richards
Office of the Attorney General
Proceedings
- Dec 09 2019Petition DENIED.
- Nov 19 2019Application (19A555) denied by Justice Kagan.
- Nov 13 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
- Oct 29 2019Application (19A555) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.
- Oct 11 2019Waiver of right of respondents The Governor of the State of California, the Attorney General of the State of California, and the Commission on Judicial Performance of the State of California to respond filed.
- Oct 10 2019Waiver of The Governor of the State of California, the Attorney General of the State of California, and the Commission on Judicial Performance of the State of California of right to respond not accepted for filing. (October 11, 2019)
- Sep 16 2019Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due October 18, 2019)