Qihui Huang v. Ajit Varadaraj Pai, Chairman of Federal Communications Commission, et al.

Ql. Whether lower court could not comply rulings of Supreme Court on: (a) “[Respondent’s] silence implies consent, not the opposite—and courts generally behave accordingly, affirming without further discussion when they agree, not when they disagree,” Kernan v. Hinojosa, 2016, 136 S.Ct. 1603; Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 1991, 111 S.Ct. 2590; and about 33 U.S. courts complied it. (App. 1.7)? (b) McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework; and Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins 109 S.Ct. 1775, (1989). And (c) “retaliation...constitute crimes and are therefore especially risky”, Burlington Northern and Santa FeRy. Co. v. White,2006,126 S.Ct. 2405. Q2. Whether anyone or lower court could prevent, relieve, comfort, or assist in prevent Respondent’s punishment, when he deprived Petitioner of life I without due process of law, under Constitution 5th and 14th Amendments? Q3. Whether anyone or lower court could alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal both parties consented important core material facts or objects? Q4. Whether the bodily or personal injured victim could seek compensations at civil court or justice, on