Charles V. Schneider v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

In consonance with Rule 10(a) & (c), this case revolves around the consistent (for decades) misfeasance of inferior courts which calls for the exercise of this Court’s long-absent supervisory power; decisions regarding an important question of federal law that conflict with relevant decisions of this Court; and, have not been, but should be finally, settled by this high Court. Far worse than any circuit split is the split between the inferior courts and the United States Supreme Court. The following two questions are presented:

1. Whether the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (or any other inferior court) has the Constitutional authority to rule in conflict with rulings/decisions of the United States Supreme Court.

2. Whether a court’s judgment or ruling is invalid when it contravenes Constitutional and/or statuary law and cites, as precedent, only inferior courts that have obviously ruled in conflict with the United States Supreme Court.