Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
James Mills v. City of Covina, California, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-56343 · judgment April 24, 2019
Certiorari denied · October 15, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Does section 356 of the California Civil Procedure Code, which tolls a statute of limitations during any period that a plaintiff is legally prevented from taking action to protect his or her rights, apply during the period that a plaintiff’s claim is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Kevin Andrew Lipeles
Lipeles Law Group, APC
For respondent
Kevin Harold Louth
Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 15 2019Petition DENIED.
- Sep 25 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
- Sep 11 2019Waiver of right of respondents City of Covina, California et al. to respond filed.
- Aug 03 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2019)