Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

County of San Diego, California, et al. v. James Soler

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-56270 · judgment February 26, 2019


Certiorari denied · November 18, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 8% cert probability (95% interval 5%–13%)

Before the decision, about 2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a state or local-government petitioner, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Questions presented

Based on a neighbor’s fraudulent report that Respondent James Soler was an Arkansas fugitive living in San Diego under a false name, an Arkansas judge issued an Affidavit of Probable Cause. The governor of Arkansas then issued a requisition for extradition, the governor of California issued a warrant, and San Diego sheriff ’s deputies arrested Soler, as commanded. The next morning, Soler informed Petitioner Ernesto Banuelos, a jail deputy, that he was not the fugitive. The next day, Soler appeared at a previously-scheduled hearing, and his counsel informed the court that Soler was claiming mistaken identity. Fingerprints were examined and re-examined, and Soler was released eight days after his arrest. The questions presented are as follows.

  1. When a prisoner is held under authority of a facially valid warrant, do individual jail staff members have a duty under the Fourteenth Amendment to investigate claims of mistaken identity (as the Ninth Circuit held below), or is procedural due process evaluated by analyzing the totality of process afforded to an arrestee (as this Court and other circuits have held)?

  2. Is a circuit court decision sufficient to “clearly establish” a constitutional right for purposes of qualified immunity, or is something more—a robust crosscircuit consensus, or a decision by this Court—required to give fair notice to a reasonable officer?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Thomas Dale Bunton
Office of County Counsel

For respondent
Todd W. Burns
Burns and Cohan

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Nov 18 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Oct 30 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
  3. Oct 28 2019
    Reply of petitioner County of San Diego and Ernesto Banuelos filed.
  4. Oct 14 2019
    Brief of respondent James Soler in opposition filed.
  5. Sep 23 2019
    Response Requested. (Due October 23, 2019)
  6. Sep 11 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
  7. Sep 04 2019
    Waiver of right of respondent James Soler to respond filed.
  8. Aug 30 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2019)