Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Cody Ross v. Johnnie Rochell, Jr.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 17-3608 · judgment April 25, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Petitioner, Detective Cody Ross, was in plain clothes conducting surveillance in a truck parked in front of the home of respondent Johnnie Rochell Jr., who pulled into his driveway, exited his vehicle and attempted to get Ross’s attention. Ross motioned for Rochell to wait a minute. Rochell left, returned with an assault rifle slung around his body, and approached Ross. Ross exited the truck, weapon drawn, and commanded Rochell to drop the rifle. Rochell dropped the weapon. Ross told Rochell to get on the ground, eventually pushing him down. Confronted with a suspect who had not yet been searched for other weapons, was not handcuffed, had an assault weapon several feet away, and with backup officers only just arriving, Ross allegedly put his gun to Rochell’s head and said he would shoot him if he ever came up on Ross with a weapon like that again. When another officer secured Rochell’s arms, Ross retrieved handcuffs from his truck and handcuffed Rochell, who was subsequently convicted of disorderly conduct for approaching Ross with the assault rifle. The questions presented are: 1. Did the Eighth Circuit depart from this Court’s decision in Kisela v. Hughes, ___ U.S. ___, 138 S. Ct. 1148 (2018) (per curiam) and numerous other cases by denying qualified immunity notwithstanding the absence of clearly established law imposing liability under circumstances closely analogous to those confronting Petitioner?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Timothy Towery Coates
Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 09 2019Petition DENIED.
- Nov 13 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
- Oct 07 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 28, 2019.
- Sep 26 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 27, 2019 to October 28, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 26 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2019)