Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Eric Baggett v. Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 18-10918 · judgment May 3, 2019


Certiorari denied · October 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Fifth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and down for a business respondent.

Question presented

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) is a federal law that prohibits age discrimination when making decisions about pay, hiring, firing, promotions, or any other condition of employment. A prima facie case of age discrimination requires that the plaintiff prove he (1) belongs to the protected group of persons over the age of forty, (2) was qualified for his position, (3) was discharged or suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) was replaced with someone younger or outside the protected group. Cervantez v. KMGP Servs. Co., Inc., 349 F.3d 4 (5th Cir. 2009). Petitioner, Eric Baggett (“Mr. Baggett”), filed a lawsuit against his employer Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, (“Oncor”) for age discrimination. Mr. Baggett’s petition was dismissed, partly sua sponte, for failure to state a claim. THE QUESTION PRESENTED IS: Whether the sufficiency of a pleading should be held to a heightened pleading standard requiring facts of each element of the claim when the claim is brought under the ADEA.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Thomas Henry Smith III
Roger G. Jain & Associates, P.C.

For respondent
Jeffery Taylor Nobles
Husch Blackwell

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 07 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Aug 28 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
  3. Aug 21 2019
    Waiver of right of respondent Oncor Electric Delivery Company, L.L.C. to respond filed.
  4. Jul 30 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 3, 2019)