Samuel A. Gurrola v. Walgreen Company

Can the world’s largest pharmacy chain influ­ ence a State to fabricate evidence to achieve its monopoly goals, abridge plaintiffs rights and steal plaintiffs property in violation of the fourth and fourteenth amendments?

Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (Fifth DCA) err dismissing a case being that it exceeded 1 year under Texas statute of frauds when it should have been promissory estoppel because Plaintiff made a substantial 92% delivery?

Did the Fifth DCA err in dismissing a fraud claim when a deposition notice was sent to the Walgreen District Manager sent to run the entire purchase and transfer operation was not a District Manager, or supervisor, he was not even a Walgreen employee, he was a person working as a government agent and as such, plaintiff was deprived of his fifth amendment privilege and deprived of his property. This occurred 5 days after the District Court dismissed the case, the Fifth DCA affirmed the lower Court stating plaintiff should have known about the rogue before the case was dismissed?

Is 100% control of a market up from 10% control obtained by buy outs and force outs a monopoly?

In applying Res Judicata, is the Fifth DCA committing manifest injustice?

Was the destruction of plaintiffs typewriters in the last days of this case considered obstruction?