Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
George Vortman v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-10038 · judgment January 21, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Does the Leon good faith exception to the exclusionary rule apply when the police search and seize property pursuant to a warrant that is void ab initio because the magistrate judge who issued the warrant had no jurisdiction or authority to do so? LIST OF ALL PARTIES. Petitioner. GEORGE VORTMAN. Respondent. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. INTERESTED PARTIES. There are no parties to the proceeding other than those named in the caption of the case.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Paul Gilruth McCarthy
Law Offices of Beles & Beles
For respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2020Petition DENIED.
- Jul 08 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
- Jun 30 2020Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jun 18 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)