Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Raleigh Rogers v. Discover Bank

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of North Carolina, No. COA19-217 · judgment December 17, 2019

Certiorari denied · October 5, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.

Question presented

  1. DOES “PRO SE” MEAN “NO SAY” OR ARE EVEN PRO SE LITIGANTS ELIGIBLE FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT NC §1A1RULE 60(b)(3) WHEN COURTS IN NORTH CAROLINA ALLOW LICENSED OPPOSING COUNSEL TO COMMIT FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION, AND MISCONDUCT?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Raleigh Rogers

For respondent
Caren Davis Enloe
Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP

Case

Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Order
Order list, October 5, 2020 · Certiorari denied

Proceedings

  1. Oct 05 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 15 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
  3. Jul 09 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent Discover Bank to respond filed.
  4. Jun 12 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)