Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Nina Shahin
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
closely related to the Questions presented for review are raised by the Respondent # 1 m his decision legal issues Those issues are disof 08/13/2018 (Appendix M). 37-39 and here are the cussed in detail on pages intessential to the topics discussed questions that are qum on those pages. right to remove the
-
Did the Petitioner have any in spite of the provisions of case to the US federal Court § 1441(a) that limits right to such removal to 28 U.S.C. of her circum“defendant” or “defendants” in view stances? filed under provisions of
-
and 4) Since the case was Fair Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. § 1691 (FCOA or § 1002) did the claims of the Regulation B, 12 C.F.R. (District Judge Leonard P. Stark) have Respondent # 1 any legal validity that the district court “had no original “did not raise jurisdiction” and that the Petitioner federal claims”?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nina Shahin
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2020Petition DENIED.
- Jul 29 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
- Mar 13 2020Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due July 15, 2020)