In Re Edward Starling

The Scope Of Complete Exclusive Jurisdictional Authority of the United States Tax Court Under Article I of The United States Constitution Upon Title 26, U.S.C Section 7441 from 1979 thru 2015; where extraordinary, unprecedented, and special interest circumstances of "[C]ash quid-pro-quo fashion in exchange for Court Deci­ sions) from the Tax Court and the United States Distri'- ct Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Divi­ sion, Macon, Georgia; in Consecutive Phases; by Chief District Court Judge Wilbur D. Owens, Junior, from 1985 thru 1999; and Chief District Court Judge C. Ashley Ro­ yal, from 2000 thru 2015; upon Appointed Limited Speci­ al Trial Judge Continuance from Chief Tax Court Judge Joel Gerbur by His Title 26, U.S.C., Section 7443A Tax Court Authority.

The Scope Of Complete Jurisdictional Author­ ity Of The United States District Court for the Distr­ ict Of Columbia, Judge Amit P. Mehta, Term-Time, Juri­ sdiction Quisi In Rem; The Power of A Court Over Plai­ ntiff's Interests in Property (meaning Awarded but not Paid Income Tax Refunds and Middleman Fees; Title 26, U.S.C., Sections 162 and 6045(a) and (b), respective­ ly); Civil Complaint Number 1:15-cv-01685 (APM); For Final Judgment Order and Payment Order(s) presented therein where Cognizable Jurisdiction Quasi In Rem was accepted; docketed; and adjudicated with Instruc­ tions and Warnings to The Defendant Chief District Court Judge C. Ashley Royal; "[W]ho Defaulted by Not Filing an Answer or Reply, which is synonymous with the term 'Guilty As Charged'; but Judge Mehta 'Refus­ ed to Acquiesce To; Honor; and Enforce His TransactiPromised which Denied Petitioners Procedural Due Pro­ cess Rights for Judge Mehta's Miscarriage of Justice.