David Tribble, et al. v. First Security Bank, et al.

QL:r:STIO;\S PHESENTED Did reliance on the Appellate Review .vuorncy for the Office of the Clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court ofJ\ppl'als' instruction Ior drufting Appellants' Abstract and Briefcause confusion and result in a denial of equal jll'ntecl ion and due process under the XIV Amendment to the United Stales Constitution by the /\rk,lIls,l'-; ("(111It olAppcals and Arkansas Supreme Court by refusing to accept Danny Tribble ,md David Tribhlcs appeal from judgment in the Circuit Court of Baxter Countv. Arkansas? Did the Arkansas Judiciary deny /\I'I,ell,1111< equal protection by not allowing Appellants' timely request of 1() days to Ilk. out or time. 111':1' abstract and brief after the judiciary was given 9Y2 ye,lrs from rIling of the complaint. CN:, :-c;)rs l'Il1111 filing the last amended complaint, required for the Circuit Court of Baxter County, /\I-I,111S;)S 1e1 rule adverse to their claims? PARTIES TO '1'1' I-: PROCEEDING The parties to tile proceeding in the i\rkalls,ls Court of Appeals, Division L and Arkansas Supreme Court were Petitioners David Tribble ,lIlel Danny Tribble, and Respondents First Security Bank. Jason Tribble and the State or Arkansas.