Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. George Russell Kayer

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 09-99027 · judgment May 13, 2019


GVR'd · December 14, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Respondent George Russell Kayer sits on Arizona’s death row for shooting Delbert Haas twice in the head more than a quarter-century ago. The state post-conviction court denied on the merits Kayer’s claim that his attorneys ineffectively investigated and presented mitigation at sentencing. Subsequently, bound by the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), the district court denied habeas relief on that claim. App. 82– 185. A divided Ninth Circuit panel, however, reversed the district court, applying no meaningful deference to the state court’s decision. App. 2–81. Judge Carlos Bea then authored a twelve-judge dissent from the denial of en banc rehearing. App. 255–289. The Question Presented is as follows: Did the Ninth Circuit violate 28 U.S.C. § 2254’s deferential standard, and employ a flawed methodology this Court has repeatedly condemned, when it granted habeas relief based on a de novo finding that a Sixth Amendment violation had occurred?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Lacey Stover Gard
Office of the Attorney General

For respondent
Jean-Claude Andre
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 9 conferences

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Linked docket
19A923

Proceedings

  1. Apr 05 2021
    Record returned to the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit (3 boxes of state court records).
  2. Jan 15 2021
    JUDGMENT ISSUED.
  3. Dec 14 2020
    Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan dissent. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
  4. Dec 07 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
  5. Nov 30 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
  6. Nov 16 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
  7. Nov 09 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
  8. Nov 02 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
  9. Oct 28 2020
    Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit (3 boxes of state court records). The remaining record is available on PACER.
  10. Oct 26 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
  11. Oct 15 2020
    Record Requested.
  12. Oct 13 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
  13. Oct 05 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
  14. Sep 02 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
  15. Sep 02 2020
    Reply of petitioners David Shinn, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  16. Aug 19 2020
    Brief of respondent George Kayer in opposition filed.
  17. Jul 14 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 19, 2020.
  18. Jul 13 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 20, 2020 to August 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  19. Jun 19 2020
    Brief amici curiae of Idaho, et al. filed.
  20. Jun 03 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 19, 2020 to July 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  21. Jun 03 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 20, 2020. See Rule 30.1.
  22. May 15 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 19, 2020)
  23. Feb 21 2020
    Application (19A923) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 16, 2020.
  24. Feb 18 2020
    Application (19A923) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 17, 2020 to April 16, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.