Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Nina Shahin

Paid petition

Certiorari denied · October 5, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

are closely related to the legal issues raised by the Respondent # 1 in his decision of 03/15/2018 (Appendix M). Those issues are discussed in detail on pages 35 - 46 and here are the questions that are the quintessential to the topics discussed on those pages. 42 U.S.C. § .1983:..

  1. How “narrow” Statute of Removal should be interpreted, especially in situations like the Petitioner’s?

  2. Does, the Petitioner’s situation meet the standards of “obtaining justice” and “local influence and prejudice” to avoid limitation of transfers to defendants only?

  3. Did the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals meet that standard? Note, the Court’s claim that “Shahin does not challenge the District Court’s remand orders, and we therefore do not consider whether we would have jurisdiction over such a challenge” (Appendix E, page 5) is a lie. That decision was entered on 05/02/19 and appeal with the

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Nina Shahin

For respondent
Ryan T Costa
Delaware Department of Justice

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 05 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 15 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent The Honorable Charles W. Welch, III to respond filed.
  3. Jun 24 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
  4. May 08 2020
    Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due June 12, 2020)