David Thorpe v. Dexter Dumas, et al.

A - Willis Burns v. Reed. 500 U.S 478 (1991) Supreme Court states "prosecutors have only qualified immunity for investigative acts. Buddy v. Fitzsimmons, 509 U.S. 259 (1993) when a prosecutor is alleged to have fabricated evidence, the prosecutor is engaged in an investigative task not a prosecutorial task. Kalina v. Fletcher, 522 U.S. 118 (1997) filling out and submitting the certificate or affidavit. This is investigative in nature and therefore, is protected by only qualified immunity. Imbler v. Pactmen 424 U.S. 409 (1976) the Supreme Court articulated distinction between absolute immunity for prosecutorial acts and qualified immunity for investigative or administrative acts ... Question 1. Whether a supervising Deputy District Attorney who assigned three (4) District Attorneys over a two-year period to a case that lacked probable cause (per discovery) to prosecute was entitled to absolute immunity under 42 U.S.C § 1983? Question 2. Whether the lower courts biaslv abused their discretion by intentionally mischaracterizing the duties of a supervising Deputy District Attorney? Question 3. Whether the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Court with disturbing ease exploited their discretion by failing to mention the true context of the Petitioners statements. Said statement being “knew of exculpatory evidence and failed to act” by