Bobby Knight v. Chenega Security, Inc., et al.

I. DID THE COURT BELOW FAIL TO USE AN APPROPRIATE STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN GRANTING ALL THE DISMISSAL MOTIONS WITHOUT RECOGNIZING THE PETITIONER’S EVIDENCE? II. DID THE COURT BELOW BY FAILING TO GRANT THE PETITIONER A TRIAL CREATE A SERIERS OF REVERSABLE ERRORS AS THE UNITED STATES SIMULTANEOUSLY FILED IT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS A DEFENDANT WHILE ELECTING TO NOT INTERVENE AS A QUI TAM PLAINTIFF? III. DID THE DISTRICT COURT DENY THE PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT BY DEFAULT CREATE A REVERSABLE ERROR? IV. DID THE DISTRICT COURT MAKE A REVERSABLE ERROR BY ALLOWING A VIOLATION OF THE STATE’S LAW THAT STRICTLY PROHIBITED THE S.C. STATE’S INSURANCE FUND ATTORNEYS TO REPRESENT A PRIVATE BUSINESS’S INDIVIDUAL OWNER? CRICHARDSON, JR)