Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kevin Sewell v. Maryland
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Maryland, No. 20, September Term, 2018 · judgment April 2, 2019
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Questions presented
-
Whether Maryland’s law imposing a duty to report suspected child abuse or neglect on all persons in the State violates the First Amendment where it mandates speech.
-
Whether Maryland’s law imposing a duty to report suspected child abuse or neglect on all persons in the State is overbroad in violation of the Due Process clause.
-
Whether Maryland’s law imposing a duty to report suspected child abuse or neglect on all persons in the State is vague in violation of the Equal Protection clause.
-
Whether Maryland’s law imposing a duty to report suspected child abuse or neglect on all persons in the State violates the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment where it permits anonymous reporting.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Erin C. Murphy
Silverman/Thompson/Slutkin/White
For respondent
Carrie J. Williams
Goodell DeVries Leech & Dann
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jul 17 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jul 09 2019Waiver of right of respondent State of Maryland to respond filed.
- Jun 28 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2019)