Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Wesley Perkins
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
Denial of Access (on Appeal) l.a (New) Is Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42A.755(e) unconstitutional, as applied? l.b (New) Are TEX.RS.App.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d) unconstitutional, facially or as applied?
-
Is 3d.CoA abusing discretion by stalling?
-
Is 3d.CoA abusing discretion by not treating LIPSCOMBE as recused?
-
Is TEX. TRANSP. Code unconstitutional, as applied?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Wesley E. Perkins
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, May 26, 2020 · Mandamus denied
Proceedings
- May 26 2020Petition DENIED.
- May 05 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
- Mar 09 2020Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due April 17, 2020)