Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Blackbird Tech LLC, dba Blackbird Technologies v. Health in Motion LLC, dba Inspire Fitness, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2018-2393 · judgment December 16, 2019


Certiorari denied · May 18, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a Federal Circuit decision below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and down for a business respondent.

Question presented

35 U.S.C. § 285 provides that a court “in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.” In Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014), this Court held that an exceptional case is “one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated.” This Court further held that “district courts may determine whether a case is ‘exceptional’ in the case-by-case exercise of their discretion, considering the totality of the circumstances.” Id. Applying Octane Fitness, in this case both the district court and Federal Circuit found this was an exceptional case based in part on the number of previous unrelated litigations filed by Petitioner without any analysis of those previous cases. The question presented is: Can a court consider factors unrelated to the instant case in determining whether a particular case is exceptional, i.e., whether those outside factors are relevant to the strength of a party’s litigating position in that particular case, or the manner in which that particular case was litigated?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Wendy Haller Verlander
Blackbord Tech LLC d/b/a Blackbird Technologies

For respondent
Willmore F. Holbrow III
Buchalter, A Professional Corporation

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 18 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 22 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
  3. Apr 09 2020
    Waiver of right of respondents Health in Motion LLC, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Mar 16 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 15, 2020)