Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Neal N. Browder, et al. v. S. R. Nehad, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-55035 · judgment July 11, 2019


Certiorari denied · October 5, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Shortly before midnight on April 29, 2015, a bookstore clerk saw Fridoon Rawshan Nehad in an alley. Nehad, who was incoherent, pulled a knife out of his backpack and said he was going to kill people. Nehad lunged at the clerk with the five-inch knife, but did not stab him. Nehad later went into the bookstore and said, at least five more times to the same bookstore clerk, that he was going to hurt or kill people. After Nehad left, the clerk called 911. A San Diego police dispatcher assigned this “hot call” the highest priority and informed officers there was a man threatening people with a knife. San Diego Police Officer Neal Browder responded to the emergency call. Pulling into a nearby alley only minutes later, Officer Browder saw Nehad and confirmed the suspect’s description from the call. Officer Browder got out of his patrol car and saw Nehad walking towards him with a metallic and shiny object held in a pointed fashion. As Nehad moved towards Officer Browder, Officer Browder fired his weapon. The total time from Officer Browder’s arrival to the time he fired his weapon was 33 seconds. Nehad’s parents and estate sued to recover damages for Nehad’s death, but the District Court found that Officer Browder enjoyed qualified immunity from suit and granted the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the District Court’s order. Did the Ninth Circuit err in denying qualified immunity to a police officer who responded to a midnight emergency call about a suspect threatening

Counsel of record

For petitioner
George Frederick Schaefer
San Diego City Attorney's Office

For respondent
Jennifer Mira Hashmall
Miller Barondess, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Linked docket
19A677

Proceedings

  1. Oct 05 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 22 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
  3. Jul 20 2020
    Reply of petitioners Neal Browder, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  4. Jul 07 2020
    Brief of respondents S.R. Nehad, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Apr 15 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 7, 2020.
  6. Apr 14 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 8, 2020 to July 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Apr 08 2020
    Response Requested. (Due May 8, 2020)
  8. Apr 01 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
  9. Mar 27 2020
    Brief amici curiae of California State Association of Counties and the League of California Cities filed.
  10. Mar 26 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent S.R. Nehad, et al. to respond filed.
  11. Feb 25 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)
  12. Jan 21 2020
    Application (19A677) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 28, 2020.
  13. Jan 16 2020
    Application (19A677) to extend further the time from January 29, 2020 to February 28, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
  14. Dec 17 2019
    Application (19A677) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 29, 2020.
  15. Dec 13 2019
    Application (19A677) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 31, 2019 to January 29, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.