Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Michael Weiss, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Jane L. Marsh, Deceased v. Damon Marsh, as Executor of the Estate of Monroe F. Marsh, Deceased, et al.

Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, No. G058123 · judgment August 30, 2019


Certiorari denied · April 27, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES: 19-713 is factually

  2. Whether Full Faith and Credit can be given to the and legally related and petitioner will move to consolidate. appellate opinion in G058123 and other of its specified 2. LIST OF PARTIES: opinions; (2) Do Code of Civ.Proc. 391.7, Code of Civ.Proc. Damon Marsh, Individually and as Co-Executor of 128.7, and/or the appellate opinion in G058123 and the Estate of Monroe F. Marsh; Stephen Marsh Individually prior opinions in this case it refers to, on their face or as and as Co-Executors of Estate of Monroe F. Marsh and; applied, violate the First Amendment and other provisions Michael Weiss, Individually and as Executor of Estate of of the Bill of Rights (3) Whether or not petitioner is himself Jane L. Marsh. Stephen Marsh is now deceased and Jane a vexatious litigant may he challenge statute on its face as Hodson Marsh is Administrator of Estate of Stephen Marsh void for overbreadth in violation of the 1st and 14th but made no appearance; and, neither has anyone else in amendments and (4) Whether declaring a specified grant his stead deed to be void as a result of above alleged violations is a 3. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ii

  3. QUESTION PRESENTED i proper remedy in these proceedings. STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES

  4. LIST OF PARTIES ii

  5. JURISDICTION & STATUTORY BASIS 1

  6. CONSTITUTIONAL CLAUSES & STATUTES 1

  7. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1

  8. ARGUMENT 4 A. VOID GRANT DEED FALLS AS RESULT OF VOID COURT OPINIONS AND SUCH DECLARATION IS NECESSARY FOR PROPER DISPOSITION OF THIS CASE B. CALIFORNIA’S VEXATIOUS LITIGANT 16 i ii

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Michael Alan Weiss
Law Office Michael Weiss

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Apr 27 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 08 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
  3. Apr 07 2020
    relief from electronic filing etc of michael weiss not accepted for filing. (April 08, 2020)
  4. Apr 01 2020
    motion consolidate and other relief as court deems necessary of michael weiss not accepted for filing. (April 10, 2020)
  5. Mar 25 2020
    excused electronic filing of michael weiss not accepted for filing. (April 08, 2020)
  6. Feb 17 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2020)