Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Tami L. Mitchell v. Thomas M. Dillahunt
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Minnesota, No. A18-1651 · judgment June 24, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Did the Minnesota District Court’s division of petitioner’s military retired pay violate the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act?
-
Did the Minnesota District Court’s failure to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding the parties’ disputes over the enforceability of the Court’s April 2, 2008 Order with respect to the dollar value of the divisible portion of her military retired pay violate her due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Tami L. Mitchell
Law Office of Tami L. Mitchell
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Apr 27 2020Petition DENIED.
- Apr 08 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
- Feb 14 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 20, 2020)
- Dec 06 2019Application (19A620) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until February 14, 2020.
- Dec 02 2019Application (19A620) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 16, 2019 to February 14, 2020, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.