Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Gerard Patrick Matthews v. William P. Barr, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 16-3145 · judgment June 18, 2019


Certiorari denied · June 29, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
David J. Zimmer
Goodwin Proctor LLP

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Linked docket
19A439

Proceedings

  1. Jun 29 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 09 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
  3. Jun 08 2020
    Reply of petitioner Gerard Matthews filed. (Distributed)
  4. May 21 2020
    Brief of respondent William P. Barr, Attorney General in opposition filed.
  5. Apr 16 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 21, 2020.
  6. Apr 13 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 20, 2020 to May 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Mar 19 2020
    Brief amici curiae of The American Immigration Lawyers Association, et al. filed.
  8. Mar 11 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 20, 2020.
  9. Mar 10 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 19, 2020 to April 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Feb 14 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 19, 2020)
  11. Oct 22 2019
    Application (19A439) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until February 14, 2020.
  12. Oct 21 2019
    Application (19A439) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 17, 2019 to February 14, 2020, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
  13. Oct 21 2019
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.