R. S. Raghavendra v. Jane E. Booth, et al.

Even before Petitioner could file his Appeal Brief and list his questions for review, on May 17, 2018, an "Attorney-Disqualification" Motion Panel of the Second Circuit -- in the context of denying his meritorious motion to disqualify the Respondent's recently retained, criminally-charged, and alreadybeing-sued attorney Gregg Mashberg for aiding and abetting the recently discovered Elaborate Perjury! Fraud/(At Least $320,000) Bribery/Extortion Scheme masterminded by Petitioner's own out-going/one-ofsix-cases/client-betraying attorney Louis D. Stober -- revoked the Petitioner's "Right to Appeal" sua sponte and summarily dismissed the Petitioner's already pending all four related appeals without any briefing or oral arguments whatsoever and by improperly disregarding all appellate procedures. The THREE questions presented are as follows: (1) Whether, after this U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 138, S. Ct. 42 (2017), the jurisdiction-lacking district judge's dismissal of Petitioner's 2017 EEOC authorized continuing illegal retaliation claims without allowing for expressly agreed arbitration for establishment of the first Anti-Discrimination "Minority Employees Association" at the 265- years old Ivy League university, even though Petitioner did not initiate any $200 MILLION DOLLARS Class Action in compliance with the 2009 Arbitration Contract, is a violation of the Federal Arbitration Act and or violation of Title VII of the Civil Right Act and or the