Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Michael S. Barth v. Township of Bernards, New Jersey, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 18-2118 · judgment September 7, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether if a member of the Court of Appeals sends a party a "racist" mailing of a court initiated letter, whether intentional or unintentional, does a related exparte in camera motion to extend the time to file an appeal because of the court's racist mailing, allow the court of appeals to file an appeal as within the time allowed by court rule, or do the court rules require a stay of that decision until the completion of a review of a separate misconduct complaint? If a Court of Appeals does not act on an ex parte in camera motion, can a party appeal without an order to appeal?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael S. Barth
For respondent
Brent R. Pohlman
Methfessel & Werbel, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 18 2019Petition DENIED.
- Feb 27 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
- Feb 08 2019Waiver of right of respondents Township of Bernards, New Jersey, et al. to respond filed.
- Nov 05 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)