Abigail Arroyo v. Angel M. Torres-Sanchez, et al.

By their deceit, abuse of discretion and unjust "fast track" imposed burden, Respondents violated the Petitioner's rights to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, property and "the guarantee of due process of law", as found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. All along the judiciary process, the Respondents have not presented any opposition to the Petitioner's alleged facts, as presented and sustained by Affidavit #10,480. This is a case of public interest. "Assuming the existence of a federal question, the element of diversity is immaterial, and so here, even though the parties are residents of this state, this court has jurisdiction, provided the jurisdictional amount is present." Coffman v. City of Whichita, Kan. 1958, 165 Fed. Supp. 765, affirmed 261 F2d 112. Fed. Courts Key 191; Fed. Courts Key 331.1. On June 3, 2017, the Hon. Federal District Court dismissed this case with prejudice, but on October 15, 2018, the Hon. U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed it without prejudice.