Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
TLSL, Inc. v. Rankin Snead, as Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of Juan Estrada, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Alabama, No. 1160947, 1160950 · judgment August 24, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
TLSL, Inc. (“TLSL”) is a Mississippi excavation contracting company. It is incorporated in Mississippi and has its principal place of business in Mississippi. Nevertheless, Alabama courts have determined TLSL is subject to general personal jurisdiction in Alabama. This is a clear violation of TLSL’s due process rights. This Court established the “at-home” test for general personal jurisdiction in Goodyear and Daimler and reaffirmed its application in Tyrrell. The question presented is whether this test should apply equally to more modest enterprises, such as TLSL, that only have connections with a minimal number of jurisdictions. The second question is whether TLSL’s due process rights were violated when Alabama’s courts held this is an “exceptional” case to subject TLSL to personal general jurisdiction despite it being incorporated in Mississippi and having its only place of business in Mississippi. More specifically, the question is whether TLSL’s operations in Alabama were so substantial and of such a nature as to render it “at home” in Alabama. This question would allow the Court to provide clarity to litigants and lower courts regarding this high burden.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert V. Wood Jr.
Wilmer & Lee, P.A.
For respondent
J. Barton Warren
Warren & Simpson, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 25 2019Petition DENIED.
- Feb 06 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
- Jan 22 2019Waiver of right of respondent Raul Cabrera A.K.A. Ricardo Valdez to respond filed.
- Jan 21 2019Waiver of right of respondent Rankin Snead, Duly Appointed Administrator ad Litem of the Estate of Juan Estrada to respond filed.
- Jan 16 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)