Michael S. Bent v. Pamela Talkin, Marshal, Supreme Court of the United States, et al.

Statutory authority for the Chief of Police of this Court is established under 40 U.S.C. § 6121(a). Under this unrestrained authority a Police Booth Operation was erected on the north side of the courthouse. Litigants must surrender all papers to the Police Booth Officers with no assurance papers will be presented timely and untampered to the Clerk. Does the Chief of Police via his Police Booth Operation violate Bent's right to be secure in his papers and his right to Due Process by seizing, without probable cause shown, papers intended for this Court? Does the District Court abuse its discretion to deny use of that court's Electronic Case Filing system without any reason whatsoever or otherwise to test Bent's ability to overcome that court's obstacles? Does Bent have supplemental standing under Flast given Congress has exceeded it constitutional authority to establish a Chief of Police for this Court who is not under the full supervisory authority of this Court?