Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1638, 2018-1639, 2018-1640 ,2018-1641, 2018-1642, 2018-1643 · judgment July 20, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
This case involves the legal characterization of the inter partes review procedure for patents, created by the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011). This Court has described inter partes review as a “procedure allow[ing] private parties to challenge previously issued patent claims in an adversarial process before the Patent Office that mimics civil litigation.” SAS Inst. Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348, 1352 (2018). In this case, the Federal Circuit held that a federally recognized Indian tribe owning a patent could not assert tribal sovereign immunity in an inter partes review proceeding because the proceeding is “more like an agency enforcement action than a civil suit brought by a private party.” Pet. App. 9a. The Question Presented is: Whether inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is the type of proceeding in which tribal sovereign immunity may be asserted.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jonathan S. Massey
Massey & Gail LLP
For respondent
Charles G. Curtis Jr.
Perkins Coie LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 15 2019Petition DENIED.
- Mar 20 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
- Mar 18 2019Reply of petitioners Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe and Allergan, Inc. filed.
- Mar 06 2019Brief of respondents Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
- Feb 07 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2019.
- Feb 05 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 11, 2019 to March 11, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 20 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)