Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1638, 2018-1639, 2018-1640 ,2018-1641, 2018-1642, 2018-1643 · judgment July 20, 2018


Certiorari denied · April 15, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

This case involves the legal characterization of the inter partes review procedure for patents, created by the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011). This Court has described inter partes review as a “procedure allow[ing] private parties to challenge previously issued patent claims in an adversarial process before the Patent Office that mimics civil litigation.” SAS Inst. Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348, 1352 (2018). In this case, the Federal Circuit held that a federally recognized Indian tribe owning a patent could not assert tribal sovereign immunity in an inter partes review proceeding because the proceeding is “more like an agency enforcement action than a civil suit brought by a private party.” Pet. App. 9a. The Question Presented is: Whether inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is the type of proceeding in which tribal sovereign immunity may be asserted.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jonathan S. Massey
Massey & Gail LLP

For respondent
Charles G. Curtis Jr.
Perkins Coie LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Apr 15 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Mar 20 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
  3. Mar 18 2019
    Reply of petitioners Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe and Allergan, Inc. filed.
  4. Mar 06 2019
    Brief of respondents Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Feb 07 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2019.
  6. Feb 05 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 11, 2019 to March 11, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Dec 20 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)