Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
John Tatum, et ux. v. The Dallas Morning News, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Texas, No. 16-0098 · judgment May 11, 2018
Certiorari denied · February 19, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether this Court’s decisions in Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. and Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Const. Industry Pension Fund hold that an otherwise verifiable accusation of dishonesty should be considered Constitutionally protected opinion under the First Amendment because such accusation is made within the framework of an opinion piece.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joseph David Sibley IV
Camara & Sibley, LLP
For respondent
Paul Christopher Watler
Jackson Walker LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 19 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jan 23 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
- Jan 11 2019Waiver of right of respondents The Dallas Morning News, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
- Dec 27 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)