Linda Shao v. McManis Faulkner, LLP

The questions presented in this case are: 1. Does due process require reversal of the dismissal of appealbased on the fact that the California 6th District Court of Appeal fraudulently dismissed the appeal by concealing from Petitioner's notice its short notice of the July 9, 2018's new due date of Opening Brief, directing Petitioner to wait for the Court's ruling on her objection for insufficient records on appeal and motions rather than to file an Opening Brief before the ruling, and thereby setting a trap for a secret and prompt dismissal of this appeal with the excuse that Petitioner did not file her Opening Brief, in disregard of the facts that Petitioner had filed part of her appellate brief--- Motion for Judicial Noticein support of her Opening Brief, that the Court was aware that Petitioner would have filed her Opening Brief but for the insufficiency of the records on appeal (All of the papers filed by Petitionerwith the trial court in response to Respondents' motions on vexatious litigant orders were not included in the records on appeal),when, in fact, 13 minutes before the Court's issuance of the notice of acceptance for filing of her Objections and Motions, the Court had already secretly ordered a new short due date for the Opening Brief to be July 9, 2018 without waiting for 15 days as required byRule 8.54(b)(1) of California Rules of Court with clear anticipation that Petitioner would miss the unnoticed due date when the secret order of July 3, 2018 and the