Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Tin Cup, LLC v. Army Corps of Engineers
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-35889 · judgment September 21, 2018
Before the decision, about 3.3× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Question presented
The Clean Water Act authorizes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to issue permits for the discharge of certain pollutants into “navigable waters,” which include at least some wetlands. In the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, Congress mandated that, when delineating wetlands under the Clean Water Act, the Corps “will continue to use the Corps of Engineers 1987 Manual . . . until a final wetlands delineation manual is adopted.” Pub. L. No. 102-377, 106 Stat. 1315, 1324 (1992). For decades, the Corps interpreted this provision as requiring the agency to use the 1987 Manual when delineating wetlands, and one circuit court has agreed. United States v. Bailey, 571 F.3d 791, 803 n.7 (8th Cir. 2009); Brief of Appellee the United States at 42, United States v. Bailey, 2008 WL 4127307 (8th Cir. Aug. 2008). The Corps has not adopted a new manual, yet below the Ninth Circuit held, in a split opinion on the question presented, that the 1993 Appropriation Act’s mandate no longer binds the Corps. To reach that result, the court of appeals panel majority held that the words “will” and “until” in an appropriations act do not bind an agency beyond the applicable fiscal year. The question presented is: Whether Congress’ use of the words “will” and “until” in a provision of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993 that provides “the Corps of Engineers will continue to use the Corps of Engineers 1987 Manual . . . until a final wetlands delineation manual is adopted,” requires the Corps to use the 1987 Manual beyond the pertinent
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jeffrey Wilson McCoy
Pacific Legal Foundation
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 29 2019Petition DENIED.
- Apr 10 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
- Apr 04 2019Reply of petitioner Tin Cup, LLC filed.
- Mar 25 2019Brief of respondent Army Corps of Engineers in opposition filed.
- Feb 15 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 25, 2019.
- Feb 13 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 21, 2019 to March 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 18 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 21, 2019.
- Jan 17 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2019 to February 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 18 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)