Eshed Alston v. Administrative Office of the Courts, Delaware Judiciary, et al.

Given that the first fourth and fourteenth RELIGIOUS guaranties are the law stated with specificity in Constitutional and legal RIGHTS that are respected by ALL States as a matter of American law and as a legal requirement of and in Constitutional American law to be accepted and acknowledged does not a name changed by COURT ORDER satisfy the LEGAL definition as a PRODUCT of protected RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION Christian identity and are absolutely PROTECTED as a matter of law regardless of race or Delaware institutional racism and carry both legal weight and United States Constitutional respect and authority as the LAW OF THE LAND that would be in contrast and in comparison to be automatically be afforded affirmatively applied given by the State of Delaware to a Caucasian convicted career criminal like FRED MAAHS receives or that of affirmation of HANDLON or WITHAM by the State who routinely receives and are given preference automatically by the State as a result of unlawful outlawed prohibited Caucasian privilege promotion illegally by the State Court system institutionally and as identified and documented as material evidence of the claims made in the contemporaneous record of proceedings regarding the intentional mispelling that was perpetrated twice criminally and antecedently in the superior court by both DOJ HANDLON and subsequently by Witham and subsequently thereafter by several others referenced ALL persons noted were absolutely acting in deliberate criminal misconduct in violation of an active CHRISTIAN NAME change COURT ORDER as an acts of deliberate racially motivated criminal obstruction of the right of protected Christian Religious expression :•-