Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Eldon Bugg v. Marc Honey, et al.

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, No. WD80480 · judgment December 12, 2017


Certiorari denied · February 25, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Under bankruptcy law, in personam jurisdiction is national. In re Federal Fountain, 165 F.3d 600,601, (8 Cir. 1999)(en bane)). ". . . physical presence alone constitutes due process. . .". Id., citing Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., 495 U.S. 604, 110 S. Ct. 2105, 109 L. Ed. 2d 631, (1990). (Emphasis added). (Alternatively, "national jurisdiction" or "National Forum"). Arkansas and Missouri, are part of United States territory, are separate venues within the National Forum, and separate sovereign territories for purposes of diversity law. Under national jurisdiction, Arkansas Respondents filed a fraudulent Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Arkansas injuring Petitioner in Missouri. Petitioner sued Respondents in Missouri state court alleging Missouri common-law torts. While the bankruptcy case was still open, Respondents appeared in the Missouri court, took affirmative actions, ultimately moved for dismissal on diversity grounds which was granted,. was affirmed on appeal, and Petitioner's application to transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court was denied.

  1. Did Respondents' appearance in Missouri, while the bankruptcy case was still open and they were still under national jurisdiction, constitute presence in Missouri (Burnham) , for purposes of personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants because Missouri is essentially just another venue in the National Forum?

  2. Did Respondents' physical presence in United

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Eldon K. Bugg

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
18A74

Proceedings

  1. Feb 25 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 06 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
  3. Aug 22 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)
  4. Jul 19 2018
    Application (18A74) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until August 31, 2018.
  5. Jun 15 2018
    Application (18A74) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 2, 2018 to August 31, 2018, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.