Jean Coulter v. Blaze Tatananni, et al.

The matters underlying this Case in the District Court solely concern fraud and theft by an "Investment" Advisor". However, this case is presented in this court as it presents solid proof of the extreme corruption and resulting denials of Due Process by members of the federal judiciary: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following procedure shall be implemented by the Clerk's Office with respect to any documents filed by Plaintiff in the future: (2) Plaintiffs filings shall then be submitted to the undersigned (emphasis added) (55a.) (a) Questions Presented Are Recusal Statutes 28 U.S. Code §455 and §144 Unconstitutionally Vague? Must the decision be overturned as Due Process is denied/impossible in the Third Circuit as displayed by evidence of crimes by Judges and facts exist which show "Pervasive Bias"? Does Due Process require that: Impartial "civilians" must decide recusal if there exists evidence of crimes by Judges; - Limits be placed on "term" on the bench; C. Parties be anonymous (if feasible); Change of venue be given for review of decisions; Complaints of Judicial Misconduct must be determined publicly and by impartial civilians; Any/all complaints of criminal acts by jurists be presented to a grand jury; Require that transfer of cases out of the Circuit be made for any/all cases of allegations of n apparent "Pervasive Bias"?