Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Choctaw County, Mississippi, et al. v. Jessica Jauch

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 16-60690 · judgment October 24, 2017


Certiorari denied · December 10, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 6% cert probability (95% interval 4%–8%)

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Fifth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).

Questions presented

The Sheriff ’s Department detained Respondent for ninety-six days pursuant to a capias issued by the state circuit court following a grand jury’s indictment for the sale of a controlled substance. The capias commanded the Sheriff to “take” and “safely keep” Respondent “so that you have his/her body before the Circuit Court of Choctaw County” at the next immediate term of court. Respondent was arrested on unrelated charges after an intervening term of court. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether a pretrial detainee’s procedural due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment have been violated when she was held for ninety-six days pursuant to a capias issued by a state circuit court following a grand jury indictment and when she was otherwise afforded all procedural due process safeguards to which she was entitled under state law.

  2. Whether a county and local county sheriff can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a pretrial detainee’s ninety-six-day detention where the moving force behind the deprivation of her protected liberty interest are state court rules, a capias issued by a state circuit court following a grand jury indictment, and statutory law.

  3. Whether a pretrial detainee’s Fourteenth Amendment liberty interest to be free from detention following a grand jury indictment was clearly established at the time of Respondent’s detention so as to deny qualified immunity to the local county sheriff.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Daniel J. Griffith
Jacks Griffith Luciano, P.A.

For respondent
Victor Israel Fleitas
Victor I. Fleitas, P.A.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 4 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Dec 10 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 03 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
  3. Nov 29 2018
    Rescheduled.
  4. Nov 26 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
  5. Nov 15 2018
    Rescheduled.
  6. Oct 31 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
  7. Oct 17 2018
    Brief of respondent Jessica Jauch in opposition filed.
  8. Sep 07 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 17, 2018.
  9. Sep 05 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 17, 2018 to October 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Aug 16 2018
    Response Requested. (Due September 17, 2018)
  11. Aug 15 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
  12. Jun 27 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)