Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Ferguson Florissant School District v. Missouri State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 16-4511 · judgment July 3, 2018


Certiorari denied · January 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 5% cert probability

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a state or local-government petitioner, a circuit split argued in the petition, and an Eighth Circuit decision below.

Question presented

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 forbids state and local voting processes that “result[] in a denial or abridgment of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race. . . .” As this Court recognized in League of United Latin Am. Citizens (LULAC) v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 508 (2006), “the ultimate right of §2 is equality of opportunity, not a guarantee of electoral success for minority preferred candidates of whatever race.” The Ferguson Florissant School District is required by Missouri Statute (Sections 162.261 and 162.291 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri) to elect its School Board members through an at-large electoral system. Presently, three of the seven members are minority preferred candidates. Under the 2010 census data, those identifying as African-American accounted for 48.19% of the voting age population. Compelling evidence was presented at trial to suggest that those identifying as African-American now constitute a majority of the voting age population. The question presented is: Does Section 2 of the Voting Right Act of 1965 allow a minority group to bring a claim against a school district’s statutorily imposed at-large electoral system where the minority group forms a numerical majority of the voting age population or, at a minimum, where the Non-Hispanic white population does not form a numerical majority?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Cindy Reeds Ormsby
Curtis, Heinz, Garrett & O'Keefe, P.C.

For respondent
Julie A. Ebenstein
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Inc.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 07 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 28 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
  3. Nov 15 2018
    Waiver of right of respondents Missouri State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Nov 02 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 6, 2018)