Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Booth James v. Montgomery Regional Airport Authority, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-14014 · judgment April 10, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Could a reasonable jury have found that Mr. Perry retaliatory attitude toward Officer James for whistleblowing, to a government representative, the proximate cause for his decision to terminate Officer James employment? Did Mr. Perry violate Civil Rules of Procedures 11 & 37 by willfully and intentionally introducing substitute evidence, (Montgomery Regional Airport Authority Employee Handbook / Lost and found Policy) into court records in place of the original (Montgomery Regional Airport Authority Employee Handbook / Lost and found Policy) evidence during discovery, which has an adverse impact on Officer James Constitutional rights? OCT 232018
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Booth T. James III
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Dec 05 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
- Aug 22 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 23, 2018)