Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

R. S. Raghavendra v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 18-1230 · judgment May 17, 2018


Certiorari denied · January 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

On July 11, 2018, by disregarding even the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's recent 2016 finding, the Appeals Court denied Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus petition to reverse a permanent injunction issued by non-recusing District Court Judge Paul A. Crotty against whom -- Criminal Complaints are already pending before U.S. Attorney/FBI and New York State Attorney General for obstruction of justice and other corrupt practices to induce payment of at least a $215,000 "BRIBE" in the guise of bogus attorney fees to his friend] financial-interest and Petitioner's own one-ofsix-cases/out-going/40-hours Attorney Louis Stober by Defendant Columbia University in exchange for betraying, masterminding an elaborate fraud scheme, and also engaging in other disbarrable attorney misconduct by demanding even totally baseless, unprecedented, and UNTHINKABLE $5,000/day fines against his own client (Plaintiff) to: fl prevent a $200 Million Dollars (Coca Cola & TEXACO-Style) Class Action against Columbia; indefinitely stay the already scheduled jury trial as ordered by New York State Supreme Court Justice Joan Kenney; and prevent completion of expressly agreed arbitration for immediate organization of an Anti-Discrimination Minority Employees Association even after the period (2003-2009) of that 265-years old prestigious University's worst racial crisis.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
R.S. Raghavendra

For respondent
Gregg M. Mashberg
Proskauer, Rose, et al.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 07 2019
    Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
  2. Nov 28 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
  3. Oct 29 2018
    Waiver of right of respondents Jane E. Booth, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Oct 09 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2018)