Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lillian Pellegrini v. Fresno County, California, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-15735 · judgment July 17, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Can the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine bar federal court jurisdiction under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b), 42 U.S.C. 1983, or 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq. when officers of the state probate courts, its agents, municipal officers and banking officers act under the color of law outside their limited authority to take property from the rightful owner through acts of fraud?
-
Is it an abuse of authority to deny de novo review when a district court relies on misstated facts in an unpublished state court’s opinion issued without notice, without review, when the state court lacked statutory authority to exercise jurisdiction over the parties to issue the opinion and when best evidence rebuts the facts contained in the opinion issued without any opportunity to be heard in any court and when equal justice requires the same rights to be maintained under the same circumstances?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Beverly Jean Pellegrini
For respondent
Peter G. Bertrand
Buchalter, APC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Feb 25 2019Rehearing DENIED.
- Feb 06 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
- Jan 29 2019Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Jan 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Nov 28 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
- Nov 13 2018Waiver of right of respondent Comerica Bank to respond filed.
- Nov 13 2018Waiver of right of respondent County of Fresno, erroneously sued as Public Guardian, Fresno County Counsel, Fresno County to respond filed.
- Nov 05 2018Waiver of right of respondent Superior Court of California for the County of Frenso to respond filed.
- Nov 02 2018Waiver of right of respondent Fresno County, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 29 2018Waiver of right of respondents UBS Financial Services Inc.; The Bank of New York Mellon to respond filed.
- Oct 05 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2018)