David Louis Whitehead v. Netflix, et al.

Whether Petitioner's case relating to Federal Judg e violating the subpoena issue allows him to by-pass the appellate process to petition the Supreme Court directly, citing Marbury v. Madison, 1803. Whether Circuit Court improperly denied petitione r's motion for reconsideration to by-pass Appellate proc ess to petition the Supreme Court directly citing Marb ury v. Madison, 1803, and conflicts. Whether Federal District Court Judge a possible material witness failure to appear after the court was properly served with valid subpoena relating to mate rial questions on witnesses reaches the height of Marb ury v. Madison, 1803. Whether Jurists presiding on the case having pecu niary interest violates the federal statutes by denying acce ss to court. 28 U.S.C. Section 455 as amended. Whether the court District Judge was influenced and had prior knowledge via witnesses (Senator Patrick Leahy and others) on decision to strike complaint and dismiss the case. Whether the Judges presiding on the petitioner's case to unseal government's investigation abused their discretion having judicial bias and pecuniary inter est and possibly part to the 100 judges investigation. Whether District Court Judge and Circuit Judges abused their discretion denying motion to unseal Government's investigation, recusal, stay, seizure of the