Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Accord Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. UCB, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2016-2610, 2016-2683, 2016-2685, 2016-2698, 2016-2710, 2017-1001 · judgment May 23, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Did the Federal Circuit commit error in holding that a patent claim to an obvious modification of a prior art compound was not invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) because the prior art compound would not have been selected as a “lead compound” that was “most promising to modify in order to improve upon its activity and obtain a compound with better activity?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Richard G. Greco
Richard G. Greco PC
For respondent
Adam R. Gahtan
Fenwick & West, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Nov 19 2018Petition DENIED.
- Nov 08 2018Brief amicus curiae of Association for Accessible Medicine filed.
- Oct 31 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
- Oct 18 2018Waiver of right of respondents UCB, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 03 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 8, 2018)