Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Judith M. Brown-Williams, et vir v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B289097 · judgment May 21, 2018

Certiorari denied · December 3, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.

Question presented

Did the Petitioner prevail in the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act violation of (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1790 et seq.) Did Respondent file the Judgment entered And signed by the trial Court on April 27, 2009? Was the April 27, 2009 judgment filed by the Respondents incorrect and false? Did Petitioners prove with the specificity required that the Respondents in concert committed the worst species of "fraud upon the Court" and RICO Violations? Did Petitioners have good cause to file the several Actions that caused Petitioners to be deemed vexatious? Where the Petitioners sanctioned by the trial due To inadvertence surprise and excusable neglect?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Judith M. Brown-Williams

For respondent
Nathaniel K. Fisher
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

Case

Subject area
Economic Activity (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Order
Order list, December 3, 2018 · Certiorari denied

Proceedings

  1. Dec 03 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 07 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
  3. Oct 16 2018
    Waiver of right of respondents Bradley & Gmelich to respond filed.
  4. Oct 16 2018
    Waiver of right of respondent Bentley Motors, Inc. Rusnak/Pasadena to respond filed.
  5. Jul 25 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)