Matthew John Stickle v. Virginia

I. Was the evidence in this case unlawfully obtained as a result of an unlawful search and seizure in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, where police used sophisticated equipment to cross the curtilage and threshold of the home without a warrant, and conducted a search for both contraband and the IP address of the modem inside of the home to obtain the physical location of the contraband without a warrant? II. Was the evidence presented of Stickle’s identity and the identity of a minor depicted in a photograph taken from a video, obtained in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution ? III. Did the admissibility of other crimes evidence in the criminal prosecution violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution? IV. Was the evidence insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the convictions in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, where the evidence showed people other than Stickle had access to the computer where contraband was found during the relevant time periods? V. Did the Court lack jurisdiction to enter an order of nolle prosequi to charges which became the subject of three new indictments, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution? VI. Were the three new indictments void for lack of jurisdiction, and therefore barred by res judicata,