Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Floyd Rose v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 17-689 · judgment May 30, 2018
Before the decision, about 1.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Second Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and down for a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Question presented
Whether the Second Circuit erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Fifth Circuit, that a robbery in which an individual victim is forced to withdraw his own money from an ATM has a sufficient effect on interstate commerce to satisfy the “commerce” element of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Christopher Landau
Ellis George LLP
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Proceedings
- Jan 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Dec 05 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
- Dec 04 2018Reply of petitioner Floyd Rose filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 20 2018Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Oct 17 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 21, 2018.
- Oct 16 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 22, 2018 to November 21, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 21 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 22, 2018)
- Aug 13 2018Application (18A159) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until September 27, 2018.
- Aug 10 2018Application (18A159) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 28, 2018 to September 27, 2018, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.